advance wars games ranked

Vertimes 2025

4 min read

·

29-12-2024

18

0

Share

Advance Wars Games Ranked: A Strategic Retrospective

The Advance Wars series, a beloved franchise on Nintendo's handheld consoles, blends charming aesthetics with surprisingly deep strategic gameplay. Each iteration refined the formula, adding new units, maps, and gameplay mechanics. Ranking these games requires considering not just personal preference, but also innovation, strategic depth, and overall impact on the series. This ranking will delve into each game, highlighting its strengths and weaknesses, while offering a critical analysis informed by years of dedicated playtime and community consensus.

This article draws inspiration from and expands upon widespread fan opinions and discussions found across numerous online forums and communities dedicated to the Advance Wars series. No specific Sciencedirect articles directly analyze the ranking of Advance Wars games, as it's a topic situated within game studies and cultural impact rather than a scientific field. However, the principles of game design and player engagement frequently discussed in academic literature related to game studies inform the framework of this ranking.

1. Advance Wars: Days of Ruin (DS): Many consider Days of Ruin the most innovative and narratively compelling entry. It diverges from the traditional formula by introducing a post-apocalyptic setting and a more serious, melancholic tone. This dramatic shift enhances the strategic elements, forcing players to adapt to limited resources and a harsher battlefield. The introduction of the CO Powers "Power", which allows the manipulation of the terrain, adds a significant strategic layer to the gameplay.

• Strengths: Unique setting, compelling narrative, innovative gameplay mechanics, challenging campaign.
• Weaknesses: The darker tone may alienate fans of the lighterhearted earlier entries.

2. Advance Wars 2: Black Hole Rising (GBA): This sequel significantly expands upon the original's foundation. The inclusion of new COs (Commanding Officers), each possessing unique abilities and playstyles, greatly increases strategic diversity. The maps are more complex and varied, demanding more tactical planning and foresight. The introduction of new units, such as the battleship, adds another dimension to combat. The improved AI also provides a more challenging experience for veterans. A pivotal aspect is the refinement of the core gameplay loop, building upon the success of the first game and laying the groundwork for future entries.

• Strengths: Expanded roster of COs, more challenging maps, enhanced AI, refined gameplay.
• Weaknesses: Some may find the increased difficulty daunting, especially compared to the original's gentler learning curve.

3. Advance Wars (GBA): The original game established the formula for the entire series. Its simple yet effective gameplay is a testament to its design. While lacking the complexity of later entries, the core mechanics are polished and intuitive. The introduction of the unique CO abilities, a cornerstone of the series' strategic depth, is established here. The charm of the game lies in its accessibility and the satisfying loop of planning, executing, and adapting strategies. It set a benchmark for turn-based strategy games on handheld consoles.

• Strengths: Accessible gameplay, charming aesthetic, foundation for the series' core mechanics.
• Weaknesses: Simpler compared to later entries, lacks the depth and complexity of sequels.

4. Advance Wars: Dual Strike (DS): While offering a similar core gameplay experience, Dual Strike felt like a step back in terms of innovation compared to Days of Ruin. The introduction of the “Dual Strike” mechanic, allowing simultaneous CO commands, presented interesting strategic opportunities. However, the lack of narrative depth and the repetition of some mechanics detract from the overall experience. Despite the improved graphics afforded by the DS hardware, it didn't truly elevate the strategic complexity significantly over its GBA predecessors.

• Strengths: Dual Strike mechanic adds a new layer to combat, improved visuals.
• Weaknesses: Lacks the narrative depth and innovation of Days of Ruin, feels somewhat derivative.

Analyzing the Ranking and Design Choices:

The ranking above reflects a balance of innovation, strategic depth, and overall enjoyment. Days of Ruin, while divisive, is highly praised for its risk-taking and the rewarding feeling of overcoming its unique challenges. Advance Wars 2 refined the existing formula to near-perfection, adding significant depth without sacrificing accessibility. The original Advance Wars holds a special place as the cornerstone that established the formula, and its legacy is undeniable. Dual Strike, while technically competent, ultimately felt less impactful in comparison.

Further analysis could examine the impact of each game’s map design. Days of Ruin, with its scarcity of resources, forced players to think more strategically about resource management and base defense. Advance Wars 2 offered a wider variety of maps, introducing new tactical scenarios and requiring greater adaptability.

The Future of Advance Wars:

The future of the series remains uncertain following the indefinite postponement of Advance Wars 1+2: Re-Boot Camp. This remake, which aimed to revitalize the franchise on the Nintendo Switch, had significant promise. However, its delay leaves fans hoping for a future that could bring new content or revisit the rich history of this beloved strategic series. A potential analysis of player feedback following this delay could offer insight into community expectations and future development. The future would benefit from understanding these expectations and learning from the past successes and shortcomings of the series.

Conclusion:

The Advance Wars series stands as a testament to the power of well-designed gameplay combined with a captivating aesthetic. Each game offers a unique experience, from the charming simplicity of the original to the innovative world of Days of Ruin. While personal preferences may influence individual rankings, the overall impact of this series on the strategy genre is undeniable, and the hope for its continued success remains strong within the gaming community. Further research, including player surveys and analyzing community discussions, could provide more quantitative data to support these qualitative assessments, bringing even more depth to understanding the success of the series.